Escalate to L368%concur with note
Agree with the escalation. Would have cited the Brazil wire's invoice reference explicitly in the findings section — it is in the evidence but not in the prose.
R. Okafor · QA lead
A stratified sample of the agent’s dispositions is re-worked by a human reviewer. The sample is weighted toward auto-closed alerts, because an unjustified clearance is the failure a regulator will find.
Agree with the escalation. Would have cited the Brazil wire's invoice reference explicitly in the findings section — it is in the evidence but not in the prose.
R. Okafor · QA lead
Source of wealth evidenced, RCA tier correctly applied. Narrative is filing-ready as drafted.
S. Lindqvist · L3
Clean false positive. Contract on file resolves the round-value pattern.
R. Okafor · QA lead
Correctly refused to clear on an unresolved alias match. Registration-number discriminator noted but appropriately not treated as dispositive.
MLRO office
Disposition reversed to RFI. Corridor growth is explained, but the agent under-weighted the absence of originator data on the aggregated pool. Retraining sample.
S. Lindqvist · L3