Back to site
Queue

Marcus D. Oyelaran

ALT-2026-88104highrisk 78
Rule
TM-STR-004 · Multiple cash deposits below reporting threshold within 14 days
Typology
Structuring
Channel
Retail deposits
Jurisdiction
US
Value
46.3K USD
Opened
Aug 30, 2026, 6:00 AM
Legal name
Marcus Dele Oyelaran
Customer type
individual
Customer since
Apr 18, 2021
Residence
Newark, New Jersey, US
Nationality
US
Occupation
Owner — residential remodelling contractor
Industry
Construction
Source of funds
Business income, contractor invoices
Declared monthly volume
40K USD
Inherent risk rating
medium
Identity verification
Documentary + database · verified
Last review
Nov 2, 2025
Alerts (12m)
2
Prior filings
0

Segments

Small business ownerCash-intensive industry5+ year tenure

Audit trail

  1. Aug 30, 06:00 AMAlert raised by TM-STR-004 — Multiple cash deposits below reporting threshold within 14 days
  2. Aug 30, 06:00 AMAssigned to heelius-investigator-4.2 · policy-pack us-bsa-2026.08
  3. Aug 31, 03:35 PMParse alert and load policy — 1 records
  4. Aug 31, 03:35 PMRetrieve KYC and relationship history — 14 records
  5. Aug 31, 03:35 PMReconstruct transaction history — 348 records
  6. Aug 31, 03:35 PMExpand counterparty network to 1 hop — 17 records
  7. Aug 31, 03:35 PMScreen subject and counterparties — 5 records
  8. Aug 31, 03:35 PMAdverse media sweep — 1,840 records
  9. Aug 31, 03:35 PMWeigh evidence and reach disposition — 8 records
  10. Aug 31, 03:35 PMDraft regulator-grade narrative — 8 records
  11. Aug 31, 03:35 PMSelf-check against the QA rubric — 8 records
  12. Aug 31, 03:35 PMDisposition ESCALATE at 68% confidence
  13. Aug 31, 03:35 PMQA sampled — concur with note (R. Okafor · QA lead)

Investigation trace

2m 35s
  1. Parse alert and load policy

    3s

    Rule TM-STR-004 resolved to typology "Structuring". Loaded the US policy pack and the institution's escalation matrix.

    • Typology: Structuring
    • Jurisdiction pack: US

    Intake · 1 records

  2. Retrieve KYC and relationship history

    11s

    Pulled the customer file, prior dispositions and the current risk rating.

    • Activity consistent with declared expectation
    • Established relationship with a stable alerting history

    KYC retrieval · 14 records

  3. Reconstruct transaction history

    27s

    Analysed 8 alerted transactions against a trailing twelve-month baseline; tested for threshold proximity, velocity, round-value patterning and pass-through.

    • Deposits cluster immediately below the reporting threshold
    • Deposits distributed across multiple locations
    • Near-complete pass-through of inbound funds

    Transaction analysis · 348 records

  4. Expand counterparty network to 1 hop

    34s

    Resolved 3 counterparties and tested for shared identifiers, device overlap, circular flow and undisclosed common control.

    • Counterparty risk flags reviewed and attributable
    • Counterparties corroborated by documentation already on file

    Counterparty network · 17 records

  5. Screen subject and counterparties

    19s

    Screened against consolidated sanctions lists, the global PEP register and internal watchlists; applied the institution's discriminator rules to each candidate.

    • OFAC SDN + Consolidated: discounted
    • Global PEP register: discounted

    Sanctions & PEP · 5 records

  6. Adverse media sweep

    22s

    Searched 42 languages across licensed and open sources, deduplicated by event and tested each candidate for homonym risk.

    • No relevant negative news identified

    Adverse media · 1,840 records

  7. Weigh evidence and reach disposition

    16s

    Aggregated 8 weighted findings; suspicion score 0.66 against the institution's thresholds.

    • Suspicion score 0.66
    • Disposition: escalate
    • Confidence 68%

    Risk reasoning · 8 records

  8. Draft regulator-grade narrative

    14s

    Composed the six-part narrative with a source citation on every asserted fact.

    • Six sections drafted
    • 8 citations attached

    Narrative drafting · 8 records

  9. Self-check against the QA rubric

    9s

    Verified every narrative assertion resolves to a retrieved record, checked policy citations and tested the disposition against the escalation matrix.

    • Routed to human review
    • Deposit pattern consistent with deliberate threshold avoidance

    Self-QA · 8 records

Agent disposition

$2.80
Escalate to L3
Calibrated confidence68%

Routed to a human

  • Deposit pattern consistent with deliberate threshold avoidance
Findings
8
Citations
8
Saved
$30

Weighted findings

F-2

Deposits cluster immediately below the reporting threshold

5 cash deposits between 8,900 USD and 9,600 USD, none reaching the 10,000 USD currency-transaction reporting threshold.

Deposit ledger, 5 records

+0.78
F-4

Near-complete pass-through of inbound funds

92% of inbound value was disbursed within the alert window, leaving no economic retention consistent with a legitimate purpose.

Transaction ledger, 8 records

+0.70
F-3

Deposits distributed across multiple locations

Deposits placed across 3 distinct locations within the alert window, a pattern consistent with either structuring or a genuine multi-site cash business.

Deposit ledger — location field

+0.42
F-6

Counterparties corroborated by documentation already on file

1 counterparty is evidenced in the customer file: Invoice references match customer's declared supplier.

Customer document store

0.62
F-1

Activity consistent with declared expectation

Alerted volume 46,300 USD sits within the declared monthly expectation of 40,000 USD recorded for this relationship (owner — residential remodelling contractor).

KYC profile CUS-448192

0.55
F-7

Screening alert discounted on identified discriminators

Oyelaran (fuzzy, 0.71) discounted: DOB differs by 14 years; Listed entity resident in a different jurisdiction; No shared identifiers.

OFAC SDN + Consolidated, UN, EU, UK OFSI

0.45
F-8

Established relationship with a stable alerting history

5-year relationship with 2 alerts in the trailing twelve months, all previously dispositioned without a filing.

Case management history

0.40
F-5

Counterparty risk flags reviewed and attributable

Flags on 1 counterparty resolve to cross-border or sector attributes already captured in the customer's risk rating.

Counterparty register

0.20

Regulator-grade narrative

Subject

Marcus Dele Oyelaran (CUS-448192) is an individual customer of the institution since April 18, 2021, resident in Newark, New Jersey, US and recorded as owner — residential remodelling contractor. The relationship carries a medium inherent risk rating, last reviewed November 2, 2025. Declared source of funds is business income, contractor invoices, with an expected monthly throughput of 40,000 USD. Identity was verified on April 18, 2021 by documentary + database.

Activity under review

Alert ALT-2026-88104 was generated by rule TM-STR-004 — multiple cash deposits below reporting threshold within 14 days — covering 8 transactions totalling 46,300 USD through the retail deposits channel between August 29, 2026 to August 20, 2026. 6 inbound and 2 outbound movements were reviewed in full, together with the customer's trailing twelve-month history and 3 counterparties resolved to 1 hop.

Findings

(1) Deposits cluster immediately below the reporting threshold. 5 cash deposits between 8,900 USD and 9,600 USD, none reaching the 10,000 USD currency-transaction reporting threshold. [Deposit ledger, 5 records] (2) Near-complete pass-through of inbound funds. 92% of inbound value was disbursed within the alert window, leaving no economic retention consistent with a legitimate purpose. [Transaction ledger, 8 records] (3) Deposits distributed across multiple locations. Deposits placed across 3 distinct locations within the alert window, a pattern consistent with either structuring or a genuine multi-site cash business. [Deposit ledger — location field]

Mitigating evidence

(1) Counterparties corroborated by documentation already on file. 1 counterparty is evidenced in the customer file: Invoice references match customer's declared supplier. [Customer document store] (2) Activity consistent with declared expectation. Alerted volume 46,300 USD sits within the declared monthly expectation of 40,000 USD recorded for this relationship (owner — residential remodelling contractor). [KYC profile CUS-448192] (3) Screening alert discounted on identified discriminators. Oyelaran (fuzzy, 0.71) discounted: DOB differs by 14 years; Listed entity resident in a different jurisdiction; No shared identifiers. [OFAC SDN + Consolidated, UN, EU, UK OFSI] (4) Established relationship with a stable alerting history. 5-year relationship with 2 alerts in the trailing twelve months, all previously dispositioned without a filing. [Case management history] (5) Counterparty risk flags reviewed and attributable. Flags on 1 counterparty resolve to cross-border or sector attributes already captured in the customer's risk rating. [Counterparty register]

Screening

OFAC SDN + Consolidated, UN, EU, UK OFSI: Oyelaran (fuzzy, 0.71) (score 0.71) — discounted. Name-only overlap on a common surname. Date of birth, nationality and all secondary identifiers diverge. Discounted under the institution's two-discriminator rule. Global PEP register: No match (score 0.11) — discounted. No PEP, RCA or close-associate match above the 0.85 review threshold.

Disposition

The activity cannot be resolved at this level and is referred to a senior investigator for determination. Referral is mandatory under the institution's escalation policy on the following grounds: deposit pattern consistent with deliberate threshold avoidance. This determination was produced by heelius-investigator-4.2 · policy-pack us-bsa-2026.08 with a calibrated confidence of 68% and is subject to the institution's quality-assurance sampling programme.

heelius-investigator-4.2 · policy-pack us-bsa-2026.088 citationsAug 31, 2026, 3:35 PM

Reviewer decision

QA sample

concur with note

Agree with the escalation. Would have cited the Brazil wire's invoice reference explicitly in the findings section — it is in the evidence but not in the prose.

R. Okafor · QA lead