Back to site
Queue

Grover Lane Café Ltd

ALT-2026-88088lowrisk 22
Rule
TM-RND-003 · Repeated round-value credits inconsistent with declared turnover
Typology
Round-amount patterning
Channel
Business banking
Jurisdiction
GB
Value
27K GBP
Opened
Aug 27, 2026, 7:00 AM
Legal name
Grover Lane Café Limited
Customer type
business
Customer since
Jan 14, 2020
Residence
Bristol, GB
Occupation
Independent coffee shop
Industry
Food & beverage
Source of funds
Trading receipts
Declared monthly volume
30K GBP
Inherent risk rating
low
Identity verification
Companies House + documentary · verified
Last review
Apr 8, 2026
Alerts (12m)
1
Prior filings
0

Beneficial owners

  • P. Naylor100% · Bristol, GB

Segments

SMECard-acquiring6-year tenure

Audit trail

  1. Aug 27, 07:00 AMAlert raised by TM-RND-003 — Repeated round-value credits inconsistent with declared turnover
  2. Aug 27, 07:00 AMAssigned to heelius-investigator-4.2 · policy-pack us-bsa-2026.08
  3. Aug 31, 03:35 PMParse alert and load policy — 1 records
  4. Aug 31, 03:35 PMRetrieve KYC and relationship history — 15 records
  5. Aug 31, 03:35 PMReconstruct transaction history — 343 records
  6. Aug 31, 03:35 PMExpand counterparty network to 1 hop — 19 records
  7. Aug 31, 03:35 PMScreen subject and counterparties — 3 records
  8. Aug 31, 03:35 PMAdverse media sweep — 1,840 records
  9. Aug 31, 03:35 PMWeigh evidence and reach disposition — 5 records
  10. Aug 31, 03:35 PMDraft regulator-grade narrative — 5 records
  11. Aug 31, 03:35 PMSelf-check against the QA rubric — 5 records
  12. Aug 31, 03:35 PMDisposition CLEARED at 97% confidence
  13. Aug 31, 03:35 PMQA sampled — concur (R. Okafor · QA lead)

Investigation trace

2m 35s
  1. Parse alert and load policy

    3s

    Rule TM-RND-003 resolved to typology "Round-amount patterning". Loaded the GB policy pack and the institution's escalation matrix.

    • Typology: Round-amount patterning
    • Jurisdiction pack: GB

    Intake · 1 records

  2. Retrieve KYC and relationship history

    11s

    Pulled the customer file, 1 beneficial-owner record, prior dispositions and the current risk rating.

    • Activity consistent with declared expectation
    • Established relationship with a stable alerting history

    KYC retrieval · 15 records

  3. Reconstruct transaction history

    27s

    Analysed 3 alerted transactions against a trailing twelve-month baseline; tested for threshold proximity, velocity, round-value patterning and pass-through.

    • Transactions carry a consistent, verifiable economic purpose

    Transaction analysis · 343 records

  4. Expand counterparty network to 1 hop

    34s

    Resolved 1 counterparties and tested for shared identifiers, device overlap, circular flow and undisclosed common control.

    • Counterparties corroborated by documentation already on file

    Counterparty network · 19 records

  5. Screen subject and counterparties

    19s

    Screened against consolidated sanctions lists, the global PEP register and internal watchlists; applied the institution's discriminator rules to each candidate.

    • OFAC SDN + Consolidated: discounted
    • Global PEP register: discounted

    Sanctions & PEP · 3 records

  6. Adverse media sweep

    22s

    Searched 42 languages across licensed and open sources, deduplicated by event and tested each candidate for homonym risk.

    • No relevant negative news identified

    Adverse media · 1,840 records

  7. Weigh evidence and reach disposition

    16s

    Aggregated 5 weighted findings; suspicion score 0.00 against the institution's thresholds.

    • Suspicion score 0.00
    • Disposition: cleared
    • Confidence 97%

    Risk reasoning · 5 records

  8. Draft regulator-grade narrative

    14s

    Composed the six-part narrative with a source citation on every asserted fact.

    • Six sections drafted
    • 5 citations attached

    Narrative drafting · 5 records

  9. Self-check against the QA rubric

    9s

    Verified every narrative assertion resolves to a retrieved record, checked policy citations and tested the disposition against the escalation matrix.

    • All assertions traced to source
    • No escalation trigger fired

    Self-QA · 5 records

Agent disposition

$2.80
Cleared
Calibrated confidence97%
Findings
5
Citations
5
Saved
$30

Weighted findings

F-5

Transactions carry a consistent, verifiable economic purpose

3 of 3 transactions reference an identifiable instrument — Catering contract Q3.

Payment reference fields

0.66
F-2

Counterparties corroborated by documentation already on file

1 counterparty is evidenced in the customer file: Contract on file since 2024.

Customer document store

0.62
F-1

Activity consistent with declared expectation

Alerted volume 27,000 GBP sits within the declared monthly expectation of 30,000 GBP recorded for this relationship (independent coffee shop).

KYC profile CUS-118840

0.55
F-3

Screening alert discounted on identified discriminators

Naylor (fuzzy, 0.71) discounted: DOB differs by 14 years; Listed entity resident in a different jurisdiction; No shared identifiers.

OFAC SDN + Consolidated, UN, EU, UK OFSI

0.45
F-4

Established relationship with a stable alerting history

7-year relationship with 1 alert in the trailing twelve months, all previously dispositioned without a filing.

Case management history

0.40

Regulator-grade narrative

Subject

Grover Lane Café Limited (CUS-118840) is a business customer of the institution since January 14, 2020, resident in Bristol, GB and recorded as independent coffee shop. The relationship carries a low inherent risk rating, last reviewed April 8, 2026. Declared source of funds is trading receipts, with an expected monthly throughput of 30,000 GBP. Identity was verified on January 14, 2020 by companies house + documentary.

Activity under review

Alert ALT-2026-88088 was generated by rule TM-RND-003 — repeated round-value credits inconsistent with declared turnover — covering 3 transactions totalling 27,000 GBP through the business banking channel between August 27, 2026 to August 25, 2026. 3 inbound and 0 outbound movements were reviewed in full, together with the customer's trailing twelve-month history and 1 counterparty resolved to 1 hop.

Findings

No indicator of concealment, threshold avoidance or unexplained value was identified across the transaction, counterparty or screening evidence reviewed.

Mitigating evidence

(1) Transactions carry a consistent, verifiable economic purpose. 3 of 3 transactions reference an identifiable instrument — Catering contract Q3. [Payment reference fields] (2) Counterparties corroborated by documentation already on file. 1 counterparty is evidenced in the customer file: Contract on file since 2024. [Customer document store] (3) Activity consistent with declared expectation. Alerted volume 27,000 GBP sits within the declared monthly expectation of 30,000 GBP recorded for this relationship (independent coffee shop). [KYC profile CUS-118840] (4) Screening alert discounted on identified discriminators. Naylor (fuzzy, 0.71) discounted: DOB differs by 14 years; Listed entity resident in a different jurisdiction; No shared identifiers. [OFAC SDN + Consolidated, UN, EU, UK OFSI] (5) Established relationship with a stable alerting history. 7-year relationship with 1 alert in the trailing twelve months, all previously dispositioned without a filing. [Case management history]

Screening

OFAC SDN + Consolidated, UN, EU, UK OFSI: Naylor (fuzzy, 0.71) (score 0.71) — discounted. Name-only overlap on a common surname. Date of birth, nationality and all secondary identifiers diverge. Discounted under the institution's two-discriminator rule. Global PEP register: No match (score 0.11) — discounted. No PEP, RCA or close-associate match above the 0.85 review threshold.

Disposition

The activity is explained by the customer's documented profile and no further action is recommended. The alert is closed as a false positive. This determination was produced by heelius-investigator-4.2 · policy-pack us-bsa-2026.08 with a calibrated confidence of 97% and is subject to the institution's quality-assurance sampling programme.

heelius-investigator-4.2 · policy-pack us-bsa-2026.085 citationsAug 31, 2026, 3:35 PM

Reviewer decision

QA sample

concur

Clean false positive. Contract on file resolves the round-value pattern.

R. Okafor · QA lead